YazSes XR feature catalogue (proposed)¶
All entries are design candidates, not available YazSes features. IDs are planning identifiers only, not feature-registry toggles or CLI names. The order reflects dependencies, not delivery promises. Acceptance checks are conditional on the ROADMAP.md entry gates.
| ID | Candidate | Example user request | Proposed priority | Primary dependency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XR-01 | XR Voice Bridge | “Open the inventory” | P0 foundation | Local event contract, consent |
| XR-02 | VRChat text composition | “Type hello to everyone” | P0 demonstrator | Host prefill + explicit send |
| XR-03 | Look & Speak object actions | “Make this cube blue” | P1 research | Scene object IDs, target confidence |
| XR-04 | Hands-free accessibility | Look + deliberate switch + speak | P1 research | Proven stop/re-arm + switch safety |
| XR-05 | Bounded voice navigation | “Go to the meeting room” | P2 | App-provided safe destinations |
| XR-06 | Avatar expression mapping | “Wave hello” | P1 experiment | Allowlisted avatar OSC parameters |
| XR-07 | Voice-based world editing | “Add three chairs” | P3 | Scene editor adapter + undo |
| XR-08 | Multilingual social subtitles | “Translate my message to Italian” | P3 | Local multilingual + translation models |
| XR-09 | Virtual meeting notes | “Summarize the session” | P2 | Authorized audio + local diarization |
| XR-10 | Spatial guide and bookmarks | “What is this object?” | P3 | App metadata + bounded local memory |
Meaning of priorities: P0 = a useful, small proof of concept; P1 = research value once P0 is validated; P2/P3 = deferred pending demand and explicit review. None of the priorities overrules ADR-030.
XR-01 — XR Voice Bridge¶
Need: a VR/XR application can consume a YazSes transcript without embedding a speech engine.
Proposed experience: an opt-in local app subscribes to final transcripts and, separately, structured command proposals. It displays recording state and never interprets a transcript as an executable command by default.
Definition of done for a future prototype: - A versioned, machine-readable, documented event contract and at least one in-process or local test client. - Default-off endpoint; authorization of each client/application; invalid origins/tokens and oversized payloads rejected. - No raw audio export, no change to current desktop dictation, and explicit handling of disconnected/slow clients. - Offline automated contract tests plus observed end-to-end latency measurements; no aspirational latency reported as achieved.
XR-02 — VRChat text composition¶
Need: entering text in a virtual world is laborious or inaccessible.
Proposed experience: speak “Hello everyone” to fill a local compose buffer. Review the result. A human then uses the host's native explicit send action.
Definition of done: - Local fake chatbox tests work with no VRChat installation, account or internet. - Research confirms current VRChat OSC chatbox behaviour in a real client before claiming compatibility; prefer documented prefill behavior, never auto-send. An independent user action is required to publish. - Capture UTF-8, text length, truncation and formatting behaviour using actual supported limits; never silently truncate an important message. - On missing host permission or disconnected client, explain the failure and keep the draft local.
See VRChat OSC overview and the historical chatbox prefill/send distinction. Documentation is not hardware-validation evidence.
XR-03 — Look & Speak object actions¶
Need: name or select a virtual object without fiddly menus.
Proposed experience: an application supplies a fresh, explicitly scoped, stable object ID for the thing in the user's headset gaze/head-ray; YazSes interprets “make this blue” as a reversible proposal.
Definition of done: - Test scene with known object IDs, raycast/gaze freshness, unique target selection and alternative input. - Ambiguous/occluded/stale target => clarify or abstain; never arbitrarily pick an object. - Reversible edit + verifiable object state; separate confirmation for consequential or external effects. - Measure target accuracy, wrong-object changes, task completion and extra confirmations; report headset or desktop simulation separately.
XR-04 — Hands-free accessibility¶
Need: participate in virtual environments without controllers or a physical keyboard.
Proposed experience: speech for text, head/gaze for target, deliberate face gesture or other accessible switch for commit, with predictable pause/fallback.
Definition of done: - More than one confirmation modality; deliberately configurable, non-default gestures; no automatic blink-to-click. - Stop/pause works under tracking loss, misrecognition, mode changes and network failure; cannot silently re-arm. - Representative accessibility usability testing with informed consent and no coercive, diagnostic or disability claims. - Track false activations, recovery time, fatigue and successful independent completion, including failures.
XR-05 — Bounded voice navigation¶
Need: move between defined spaces without complex menu interaction.
Proposed experience: “Go to the meeting room” selects a destination supplied by the host app.
Definition of done: - Explicit allowlist of destinations; preview and cancel options; no arbitrary coordinates or continuous motion by voice alone. - Respect host permissions and comfort/safety preferences; a safe fallback if navigation is blocked. - Record cancellation rate, wrong-destination rate and user-reported comfort. No claim of cybersickness prevention absent evidence.
XR-06 — Avatar expression mapping¶
Need: trigger configured avatar expressions without searching menu wheels.
Proposed experience: “Wave hello” proposes an allowlisted avatar parameter action; the host executes only if that avatar exposes it.
Definition of done: - OSC avatar parameter names/types discovered or configured from documented host data, not guessed. - Confirm actual avatar support before claiming an expression succeeded; release any held button/axis states safely. - Test mock transport, mismatched parameter types, avatar change and disconnected client. - No impersonation or actions on other participants' avatars.
See VRChat OSC avatar parameters.
XR-07 — Voice-based world editing¶
Need: use language to perform repetitive edits in a user-owned, supported scene.
Proposed experience: in a sandbox scene editor, “Add three chairs” places predefined assets as a preview; the user accepts or undoes.
Definition of done: - Named asset catalogue and ownership/permission boundaries; no arbitrary model generation by default. - Deterministic action plan, scene-level undo and postcondition check. - Multi-object and destructive operations require explicit confirmation. - Measure scene correctness, undo reliability and unintended edits before exposing shared-world changes.
XR-08 — Multilingual social subtitles¶
Need: communicate across languages without a remote speech service.
Proposed experience: locally transcribe an explicitly enrolled speaker's audio, translate using a separately installed on-device model, display or prefill translated text for review.
Definition of done: - Separate STT language support, translation-model quality and output transport; all labelled by actual validation. - No capture of other participants without permission; opt-in for translation and any sharing. - Preserve names/negation, provide easy original/translated comparison, measure meaning errors. - A translation engine or real-time subtitle client is not currently guaranteed.
XR-09 — Virtual meeting notes¶
Need: retain decisions from consented virtual classes or team meetings.
Proposed experience: authorized meeting audio enters YazSes's local meeting pipeline, and the user reviews a labelled transcript and optional minutes.
Definition of done: - Reliable, consented access to each permitted audio channel; no background recording. - Local speaker labels explicitly qualified when attribution is uncertain. - Document retention, deletion and sharing; no automatic upload or mailing. - Compare transcript quality, attribution, summary fidelity and false attributions with held-out examples.
XR-10 — Spatial guide and bookmarks¶
Need: ask about known objects or find a previously visited location.
Proposed experience: the host provides a stable scene object reference and metadata; a user asks “What is this sculpture?” or bookmarks an allowed location locally.
Definition of done: - Read-only object lookup works without generating invented facts; cite object/source metadata if available. - Bookmark storage local and explicitly removable; never publish location history. - “Unknown object” and changed worlds lead to clarification or “I don't know,” not fabricated answers. - Measure object grounding and retrieval accuracy on known scenes.
Candidate sequencing¶
The first useful proof is XR-02 in a local test scene with native confirmation. XR-01 then provides a reusable local application boundary, XR-06 tests narrow app-specific actions, and XR-03 + XR-04 advance the existing gaze/hands-free research. XR-05, XR-07, XR-08, XR-09 and XR-10 remain later options with independent evidence and governance gates.
Do not register these in the shipped feature catalogue or add user-facing install commands until code, integration tests, release gates and real platform validation exist.