idkmesh

Open-issue continuation — Phase B2 Task 002 evidence

Date: 2026-08-29 Primary issue: #5

Project-owner request

Go ahead and work on the issues.

The repository instructions supplied with the request required current-issue inspection, bounded pull requests, exact-diff review, green current-head evidence, and a fresh main snapshot after every integration.

Interpretation and actions

The live tracker and open pull requests were inspected before changing files. Issue #152 was not used as a machine-work target because its remaining gate is genuinely independent human review under #167. While PR #310 was being checked, it merged externally; the workspace was refreshed to canonical main at 90e5cb8 rather than continuing on its stale source branch.

The next bounded issue #5 slice is frozen Phase B2 Task 002:

• reconstruct the already-canonical one-file candidate against exact source 9c53bb4069a5db1c0688dbbe7a8f028540cbf7c2;
• package it as ResultManifest v0.1;
• run the frozen public EvaluatorPlan v0.3 metadata verifier;
• retain behavioral evidence that a frozen cohort without definition_digest fails for that field;
• seed a weakened-schema regression inside the isolated verifier checkout and require the new self-test to reject it with a diagnostic;
• attach evidence without changing the frozen cohort definition digest.

The plan was posted publicly on issue #5 before implementation.

Authority boundary

The worker harness operates on an isolated checkout. Candidate code is not executed by the metadata verifier. The weakened-validator probe runs only in a separate subprocess and does not alter the frozen schema or candidate patch. The harness grants no canonical write, push, merge, or automatic-selection authority.

Community impact

The replay test and retained diagnostics let another contributor reproduce the Task 002 result without relying on this chat or on a transient CI artifact.

This site is open source. Improve this page.